In any case it's the one I'd choose of the three. If you're anything like me don't buy any of the games, if however you can live with a game so broken it should've never been made available to the public (early access or not) you will probably have a lot of fun with DayZ. Zombies glitching through walls is not everyday stuff but more like every-minute stuff, hell you'll even see players doing it now and then. It usually takes a couple of seconds for your opponent to drop even with a headshot which is often enough time for them to take you out as well. Worst of all though is the horrible hit registration and damage delays, it often feels like you might as well be shooting at a sandbag. The rest of the video is (as expected) riddled with bugs (and hackers) as well. This moment pretty much sums up the current DayZ situation. Now all this aside isn't to say that you can't have a lot of fun with DayZ, but for me the horrendous gameplay / feel and the mountain of bugs quickly overshadows the rest of the experience. It includes: system for equiping units, which includes body armor, universal transport vests, helmets, hats and much more. Arma 3 is released (as in out of beta, on the market, what ever) and it is still riddled with terrible gameplay flaws. VeteranMOD is designed primarily to demonstrate new and reviewed features of the game, as well as the general direction of our work. Regardless of what people think the majority of these problems will not be fixed. DayZ sure has a lot of potential but it will never be a good game, mainly because the engine it's built on is terrible.

Arma 3 veteran mod